IS

Lee, James D.

Topic Weight Topic Terms
0.296 modeling models model business research paradigm components using representation extension logical set existing way aspects
0.242 group support groups meeting gdss decision systems meetings technology study electronic ems task process communication
0.198 business large organizations using work changing rapidly make today's available designed need increasingly recent manage
0.188 approach analysis application approaches new used paper methodology simulation traditional techniques systems process based using
0.161 software development maintenance case productivity application tools systems function tool engineering projects effort code developed
0.157 user involvement development users satisfaction systems relationship specific results successful process attitude participative implementation effective
0.140 workflow tools set paper management specification command support formal implemented scenarios associated sequence large derived

Focal Researcher     Coauthors of Focal Researcher (1st degree)     Coauthors of Coauthors (2nd degree)

Note: click on a node to go to a researcher's profile page. Drag a node to reallocate. Number on the edge is the number of co-authorships.

Dean, Douglas L. 2 HICKEY, ANN M. 1 Nunamaker, Jr., Jay F. 1 Orwig, Richard E. 1
Pendergast, Mark O. 1 Vogel, Douglas R. 1
electronic meeting systems 2 activity modeling 1 business process improvement 1 business process modeling 1
data modeling 1 enterprise analysis 1 group modeling 1 IDEF modeling. 1

Articles (2)

Enabling the Effective Involvement of Multiple Users: Methods and Tools for Collaborative Software Engineering. (Journal of Management Information Systems, 1997)
Authors: Abstract:
    The paper presents results of ongoing research to support effective user involvement during systems development projects. The Collaborative Software Engineering Methodology is presented as a framework that contains mechanisms to support three layers of user involvement: selected user representatives, user groups, and the broader user community. Productivity and user participation of traditional group meetings have been limited by chauffeured facilitation and by support of single-user tools designed for analysts rather than users. The paper introduces electronic meeting systems (EMS) modeling tools designed to allow users to work in parallel to contribute directly during meetings. These tools are easy to use while containing support features traditionally associated with CASE tools. The methodology includes a sequence of requirements abstractions that users engage directly including activity models, data models, scenarios, system use eases, and prototypes. This methodology is designed to help organizations respond to today's rapidly changing information processing needs.
Technological Support for Group Process Modeling. (Journal of Management Information Systems, 1994)
Authors: Abstract:
    During business analysis, business activities are modeled and analyzed. Redefined models become the blueprints for improved business activities. The cost to produce models of the organization is high and model accuracy is important. Involvement from knowledgeable participants and stakeholders is desirable during business modeling and analysis. Traditional modeling approaches limit direct participation to a small handful of participants. This paper discusses the development and evaluation of an electronic meeting system (EMS) based activity modeling tool. Modeling efforts supported by this new approach are compared with modeling efforts supported by analysts with a single-user tool. The results of this comparison reveal that the EMS-based modeling tool allows a greater number of individuals to participate efficiently in model development. Models are developed between 175 percent and 251 percent faster with the new approach than with the traditional approach. Specific features are discussed that help relatively novice modelers work with analysts to develop models of reasonable quality. Measures are set forth that can be used to assess modeling efficiency and quality.